Just Take Away Their Guns - 819 Words

In James Q. Wilson’s New York Times article, â€Å"Just Take Away Their Guns,† Wilson sufficiently reasons how the elimination of illegal guns on the streets should be the central focus in determining the limits regarding American gun control regulations which are frequently debated in our modern world. While Wilson makes an effective argument, at times, he racially profiles which is a definite form of deceptive reasoning; in addition, many of Wilson’s arguments lack the elaboration he needs to avoid making hasty assertions. Wilson argues in his essay that not allowing people to buy guns will have no effect on the illegal use of guns, which in essence, is the sole reasoning for wanting to eliminate guns in the first place. He makes the claim†¦show more content†¦However, when making this point, Wilson alludes to the idea of the effectiveness of racial profiling. When making this claim on the effectiveness of employing more frequent, random searches, Wilson concedes that even though, â€Å"innocent people will be stopped,† and, â€Å"young black and Hispanic men will probably be stopped more than older white Anglo males and women of any race,† these searches are the only means by which we can eliminate illegal guns on the streets. Instead of analyzing the likely effects of this racial profiling on racial relations, Wilson uses circular reasoning to come to a conclusion that he has already previously made without exploring other options. â€Å"If we are serious about reducing drive- by shootings, fatal gang-wars and lethal quarrels in public places,† Wilson concludes that the only way is through these random searches regardless of whether or not racial profiling comes into play. By reasoning in such a manner, Wilson loses credibility and his argument suffers for this. This specific point brings to mind more questions that Wilson lacks the answers to. In this argument that police should be taught to be able to spot people that look like they are carrying guns, Wilson does not elaborate on how this would be possible. This jump in his reasoning leaves his argument a little patchy in the sense that it is hard to buy into a plan that has noShow MoreRelatedJust Take Away Their Guns955 Words   |  4 PagesClick-Clack-Bow! This is the noise of gun going off, something that is heard everyday. This very noise not only injures people, but it causes innocent people to die. Guns are the number one cause of leading deaths today. According to James Q. Wilson article à ¢â‚¬Å"Just Take Away Their Guns,† Wilson states that both the President and public want tougher gun control laws (125). The only difference is that the public believes that it won’t change anything. Wilson also believes that it would take a politically impossibleRead MoreJust Take Away Their Guns : A Critical Analysis1229 Words   |  5 Pages 2015 Just Take away Their Guns: A Critical Analysis by Dr. Justin Barnard â€Å"Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the legal use of guns† (pg.125). Author James Q. Wilson, a professor of management and public policy at the University of California in Los Angeles writes the article â€Å"Just Take Away Their Guns† to provide the American public with evidence of why taking away their guns will have little effect on crime in the United States. â€Å"Just Take Away Their Guns†Read More Contrast Essay Between essays Just Take Away Thier Guns and I Want A Wife1805 Words   |  8 Pages Just Take Away Their Guns is an effective argument than I Want a Wife. James Wilson gives a more factual, organizational and better language used argument than Judy Brady. In I Want a Wife Brady is stereotypical of what she believes to be the roles of the husband and wife. Also Bradys essay is one sided, she never states a side that would argue her viewpoint. While Wilson shows two clearly stated sides of his argument. The first reason as to why ?Just Take Away Their Guns? is moreRead MoreGun Control Essay1155 Words   |  5 PagesGun Control in America Gun control recently has become a more serious problem in the eyes of the government. It is true that guns kill people, but so do bombs and car crashes. Guns do not shoot themselves, someone has pull the trigger. The problem with guns is not that they exist, but that people have started to misuse them more and more. Taking away guns would cause more problems than keeping them would. Guns are not just used for harming people, hunting also requires guns. Hunting is a very popularRead MoreWhat Would The World Be Like If Guns Were Banned?1062 Words   |  5 PagesWhat would the world be like if guns were banned? Would chaos break out, or would the United States have peace? The Second Amendment grants U.S. Citizens the right to keep and bear arms. While some people believe banning guns will make the world safer, others believe the world will only be in more danger. Prohibition did not work for alcohol and drugs, so why would it work for guns? Guns should not be banned because crime rate would increase, people need guns for self-defense, and it will eliminateRead MoreThe Government Should Not Control Over Our Guns Essay727 Words   |  3 PagesDraegan Eng 101 30526 24 June 2015 Gun Control â€Å"These kids spend a majority of their time in school, and if they’re not having a positive experience, they can become depressed. In some cases, they lash out, grabbing whatever weapon is available to them. It can be an assault rifle, a knife, a Molotov cocktail, poison, Indian burns or MMA. But if you take one weapon away, these kids are just going to grab the next thing available to them. Maybe they will use a gun with a smaller clip, limiting the amountRead MoreIs Gun Control the Answer? Essay1422 Words   |  6 Pagesinvolving firearms the focus is turned to gun control. This has turned the issue of gun control into a major debate in our nation. When it comes to taking a side on the issue many people decide completely on an emotional level instead of looking at the issue rationally. People think that solving violent crimes involving guns is as easy as taking away the guns. How do you go about taking guns away if that is the solution, or what will the effects be of t aking guns away from people who don’t use them forRead MoreThe Meaning of the Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms Essay1169 Words   |  5 Pagesessential rights of the people They believed so strongly that we needed the right to have guns that they put it second in the Bill of Rights. When the Bill of Rights was written it was after Americans had gone through tyranny of Great Britain. The founding fathers did not want what the rights of free people taken away again. They were also afraid that a centralized government could over throw the people and take over without a fight. The founding fathers wanted the people to be able to fight for freedomRead MoreGun Laws Should Not Be Banned1426 Words   |  6 Pagesanother gun control debate comes spiraling from the after math as laws against guns try to be placed. Is this really the best way to deal with the issue? No. The issue is people are killing people not guns are killing people. Society wants to ban guns because people are afraid when in actuality guns themselves are not the things that need to be banned. Even then do you have any proof the gun laws actually lower crime? Gun laws also go directly against the 2nd Amendment and it takes away one of theRead MoreThe Debate Over Gun Control939 Words   |  4 PagesGun Control Close your eyes and relax. Imagine that you are in a time of 236 years ago, and imagine that you are one of the few people that had the privilege of writing the country’s constitution. It would not take long until you get to the second amendment. This amendment reads â€Å"A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed† (Davis). This amendment has extreme importance, and should not be